whats the worst pair of skis you've had? Could be the color, performance, shape, or anything.
I had a pair of K2's (1996 i think). I can't remember the model, but they were red and they were straight. Those were probably my least favorite skis.
__________
"Do What You Like, Like What You Do"-Life is Good
For me, I'd have to go with Atomic's 10.20 (the orange ones) from 2000-2001. They were unstable at speed to the point that they would lose contact with the snow. Plus, not only did they delaminate quickly under my feet, but the whole plastic plate split on 1 ski, and a chunk of it broke off under the bindings. And let's talk about the bindings. I went through 4 pairs due to defective springs in the heel piece. Even when I would be forced to set them to 14, I could still walk out of them... and no, I'm not exaggerating. Atomic replaced both the skis, and each set of bindings, but after the 1st season I had them, they didn't get much use.
__________
Do not drink Pepsi, do not eat M&M's, because they are the tools of Babylon.
I had some bad atomics one time (same vintage), just the same way, I delaminated two pairs of them, the shop said I was skiing to fast. How can one ski to fast, bah. The bindings pre-released a lot as well. Bad experience overall, they ended up giving me next years ski, which still wasn't great. They are my rock skis now.
Somewhere around 1980, I had two pair of Kestle CPM Ti skis. Both were around 203-205, and seemed to be almost identical in flex, sidecut, base flatness, condition and tune of the edges, etc..
One was a very reasonable ski for those days, while the other was the most skitterish pair I had (or have) ever been on. That pair was essentially unusable. I thought I had thoroughly checked for railed edges and various other possible causes, but never figured out what the difference was.
With 20-20 hindsight, I now think that I may not have been thorough in checking for railed edges up and down the length of the ski. I mostly checked in the mid-section, but I guess it's possible that the base, up towards the tip of the ski, was very concave. I would still like to know for sure.
In 1971, I was a grad student and broke. That season, I delaminated a couple of pairs of skis (including a supposedly indestructable pair of Head 360s). Desperate to ski, late into that season, I found a pair of used 207cm. Downhill VR17 Dynamiques for $30.
All they wanted to do was to go straight. Trying to ski the soft bumps on Downdraft at Killington was frustrating as the tips buried themselves in the bumps rather than going over or around the bumps.
The next time I went, I took the two good skis that I had remaining from the two broken pairs. I think my left foot was on a Hart King and my right on a Head 360. The VR17s - in the trash with the two broken skis.
I forget the brand, but they were wooden skis with out metal edges that were hand me downs. To 'sharpen' the edges the skis were based through a tables saw. Turning was a slow process that involved total enagement every fiber of my being.
In the modern era my worst set of skis was pair of foam core Rossignal DV-6s that were an OK bump skis, but turned into 'noodles' after one season and these things were wild weasels at speed. But compared to the all wood jobs without edges were wonderful.
Aluminum makes good foil, not skis. Thankfully they were free. They had the funniest sound when you skied bumps, like a tuning fork on every trough... pyoooon, pyooon, pyoooon, pyoon, pyooon....
Had a pair of Head 360s in the 1970s. They were a little too soft for me and at the end of the last (obviously) season I used them, I delaminated the tail of one of the skis. I figured, what the hell, only a few weeks more in the season, I'll keep skiing them. About five inches of edge flopped around a bit and I left little pieces of the wood core on the trail. The next year I bought Head Vector 215s. They were a lot sturdier.
I had some bad atomics one time (same vintage), just the same way, I delaminated two pairs of them, the shop said I was skiing to fast. How can one ski to fast, bah. The bindings pre-released a lot as well. Bad experience overall, they ended up giving me next years ski, which still wasn't great. They are my rock skis now.
-porter
Atomic did the same thing for me. But what good is them giving you a new pair if they were equal to the ones that had issues. For the first pair, I tried to quiet the tips down with one of those gel pack dampeners toward each tip (at about the point where there's still contact with the snow). It worked okay, but I still didn't trust the ski. Especially where I broke binding heal after binding heal. That season I was racing on their GS ski as well (the 10.22) and I had a race stock binding on it that still would eject me every once in a while set at 15!! to this day, I won't even demo a pair of Atomics because I don't want to risk getting hurt.
__________
Do not drink Pepsi, do not eat M&M's, because they are the tools of Babylon.
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 - 11:03 PM GMT Edited: Nov 12, 2004 - 11:05 PM GMT
This is a fascinating topic for those, like me, that haven't been skiing that long.
I'm waiting for IskiAtomic to weigh in on the de-laminating Atomic's.
I was thinking of getting some Bandit B2's
My wife liked the K2 T9's she tried
I like the idea of the 'pinging' ALU ski's. Fair warning of your approach !
Are you guys particularly big/strong/heavy ? I'm just 135 lbs or so, I'm told I'm a fairly aggresive skier, and my 2 season old Rossi's (Cut 10.6) are just beginning to lose their 'pop' (according to the guy in the shop. We just had our annual Binding test/tune up).
Gotta do some demo-ing I guess TX
__________
Don't Sweat The Petty Stuff, And Don't Pet The Sweaty Stuff
I love these skies, a lot of people feel that elan is a frindge brand, however, these skis are something else. I think the same model is being marketed as the 666 this year. If you get a chance to demo these, DO IT
Posted: Nov 13, 2004 - 12:49 AM GMT Edited: Nov 13, 2004 - 12:50 AM GMT
My worst pair of skis is not having any. I hate having to rent. Though I don't have to worry about that anymore. I have my Salomons to keep me happy.
__________ Fall Linen. Imaginary line following the most direct path down a slope that skiers continuously traverse on a run, often stopping at other invisible slope features along the way like the Tumble Lane, the Stagger Path and the Topple Zone.
These aren't really a bad pair of skis at all, as long as you stay in the park. Outside the park they are horrible, half because they are noodles when you buy them, half because the binding mount is dead center front-to-back on the ski (for easier rotation). I still love them to death. They are so light i can 360 standing still, so doing it off tabletop in the park is a piece of cake.
Since i couldn't really ski the lines all over the mountain (without killing myself) i picked up a pair of Rossi Scratch BC's, which actually make a great all mountain ski (like sex in powder) and pull their weight in the park (although noticably heavier than the line's). Their only downside is bumps and crud, but they aren't made for that so you can't blame them.
I also have a pair of Atomic Beta Ride 11.2's, which i don't use much because they are so-so in powder (scratch bc's) and are not a park or freestyle ski at all. But oh do they rip in crud and packed powder. Have about 40 days on the atomics and 25 on the scratch's with no problems whatsover.
About 50 days on the lines, and although noodles, which doesn't matter in the park, they are fine save a few chips out of the cap due to mute 360's gone wrong (edge to topsheet = chip)