10 Recent Topics:

Guess This Open Area #25  by newenglandskier13, Jul 30, 2014 - 11:02 AM GMT - 3 Replies

Stratton Gondola  by tom white, Jul 30, 2014 - 1:07 AM GMT - 0 Replies

Vanity plates w/ski theme  by obienick, Jul 30, 2014 - 12:56 AM GMT - 40 Replies

Video: Dismantling the Spear Lift  by joshua segal, Jul 29, 2014 - 11:50 PM GMT - 1 Replies

PCMR v. Talisker: judge will sign eviction order, demands mediation  by intlski, Jul 29, 2014 - 7:47 PM GMT - 20 Replies

NELSAP Areas on Street View  by newpylong, Jul 29, 2014 - 3:00 PM GMT - 5 Replies

Waterville expansion  by Bkroon9175, Jul 29, 2014 - 2:22 PM GMT - 7 Replies

EB-5 Issues Brewing at Jay Peak  by tom white, Jul 29, 2014 - 1:10 PM GMT - 1 Replies

Sunapee Court Ruling  by tom white, Jul 29, 2014 - 11:22 AM GMT - 26 Replies

State finally gives Tupper Lake approval  by NewYorkSkier17, Jul 28, 2014 - 4:19 PM GMT - 34 Replies
 
 

 
  75 guests
2 members

Welcome Anonymous



Members logged in:

bigbobs
newenglandskier13
 
 
NELSAP.org | SkiMaps.com
 
 
Member Login
USER:   PASS:   Remember me  
Create new account | Lost password?
 
 
Home

Forums : NELSAP Discussion : NELSAP Discussion
Moderated by: Chris, nelsap, Betsy, the_hop

Anonymous posts are not allowed in this forum

Attitash Expansion?

Page: 1  2 
Author Post
lonk7880
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Aug 05, 2004

Posts: 392

Location:
New York, NY


Posted: Dec 06, 2006 - 11:47 PM GMT

With all the talk of Waterville's expansion, I thought I would just ask about Attitash. I know nothing about any expansion, but the resort-ranking issue of "Ski" magazine says that they are hoping to expand into the center gully that rises above the resort. Any truth to this? (I don't know if "Ski" is to be trusted after listing Holiday Valley in the top ten and not including Jay... but we've already discussed this...)
maplevalleymaster
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Aug 06, 2005

Posts: 1129

Location:
Ludlow, VT



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 1:58 AM GMT

It would make sense trying to expand into the center, but I am not sure if ASC would want to sink the money into Attitash. Most of the profits are funneled out to the Canyons.
rocket21
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Sep 13, 2001

Posts: 8888

Location:
USA



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 2:25 AM GMT

Quote:
Most of the profits


Hahahahahaha

__________
NewEnglandSkiHistory.com
dangelone
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
May 26, 2004

Posts: 381

Location:


Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 2:41 AM GMT

Didn;t they just build an entire area.
nelsap
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Nov 21, 2001

Posts: 3912

Location:
Saratoga Springs, NY


Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 2:47 AM GMT

With a few exceptions, I think we are done the age of expansion at most mountains. A few trails/lifts here and there, but nothing big I bet.

jeremy

__________
Jeremy Davis
obienick
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Oct 21, 2005

Posts: 1512

Location:


Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 4:21 AM GMT

There's no money in ASC for any expansions.
DrJeff
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Apr 29, 2002

Posts: 1002

Location:



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 6:54 AM GMT

Of you actually look at the financials for ASC, the skiing/riding side of the business is actually making money (and has been doing it consistantly for years), its the debt service from all of the real estate (both new development and over paying for area acquistion) that is killing them(and in all likely hood will eventually lead to the break-up of ASC in bankruptcy court some day).

Last year, they actually had a decent year where they decreased their overall debt by something close to 65 million, however, their still in the red by over 350 million! To "help" their debt situation off, they even gave their CEO a bonus last year of over $450,000 to give him a total compensation package last year of over $900,000
rocket21
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Sep 13, 2001

Posts: 8888

Location:
USA



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 12:37 PM GMT

Another issue is that in all of these years of debt, there's been little money to go around to keep the areas up to date (everything's aging, just look around at them)...this is what could actually sink them if anything does - wouldn't matter if they climbed close to out of debt if they needed to then dump tens of millions back into the areas.

__________
NewEnglandSkiHistory.com
Davev
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Oct 20, 2001

Posts: 1495

Location:



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 12:50 PM GMT

Way to turn this into another "ASC financials" thread.. Perhaps the terrain and WMNF issues could be discussed..?
DrJeff
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Apr 29, 2002

Posts: 1002

Location:



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 2:20 PM GMT

Quote:
Way to turn this into another "ASC financials" thread.. Perhaps the terrain and WMNF issues could be discussed..?


That bowl between Attitash and Bear Peak has always been a major "drool factor" looking piece of terrain, no doubt about it. But unfortunately as you so correctly stated, its almost inevitable that if the discussion is about an ASC property, that their financials and the word debt will be brought up

obienick
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Oct 21, 2005

Posts: 1512

Location:


Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 3:39 PM GMT

I apologize for turning the tread immediately to financials. However, it is a serious limiting factor for ASC.

If they had the money, would expand into that area. ASC has been able to sweet-talk the USFS in many regards such as the Slide Brook Express Quad at Sugarbush, the entire Bear Peak expansion, and of course the half-built connection between Killington and Pico.
photogf128
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Apr 10, 2004

Posts: 2669

Location:
MRV Vermont



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 4:16 PM GMT
Edited: Dec 07, 2006 - 4:30 PM GMT

Quote:
Any truth to this? (I don't know if "Ski" is to be trusted after listing Holiday Valley in the top ten and not including Jay... but we've already discussed this...)


Then you know that HV made the list cause it was a readers survey not an editorial opinion. Secondly they don't make this stuff up just report what is reported to them, your problem should be with the readers and Attitash not SKI.

FWIW, both SKI and SKIING are up for sale, they are published by the same company.

Regarding Sugarbush and the GMNF I guess "sweet talk" might work but they have heavy restrictions regarding the basin.

Some interesting historical factoids, can't remember his name but the man who donated the land, that Sugarbush(LP) is on, to the GMNF he stipulated that it remain forever wild. After Sugarbush was built in 1958 by the Gadds and Murphy the family of the donor sued the GMNF, if memory serves they lost cause it was a verbal stipulation, not a legal covenant. Plus I bet the GMNF wanted the cashola.


__________
facebook.com/profile.php?id=1454198707#!/pages/American-Photoart-Gallery/90884206988
lonk7880
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Aug 05, 2004

Posts: 392

Location:
New York, NY


Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 5:16 PM GMT

Actually, you CAN blame Ski and not just it's readers... (this off topic I know) but just tabultating popularity, and equating family services with challenge or snow is crap. I know it's a matter of opinion but the way they weight the rankings and popularity is what get's me.

Now back to the topic... maybe it's a good thing the age of crazy expansion has ended, but now all the funds seem to fuel real estate, so maybe that's a bad thing.

Does anyone ever climb above the summit into that bowl? I've never heard of any backcountry skiing up in there.
photogf128
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Apr 10, 2004

Posts: 2669

Location:
MRV Vermont



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 5:55 PM GMT
Edited: Dec 07, 2006 - 5:56 PM GMT

I was referring strictly to the readers survey they do each year.

If your talking about the Slide Brook Basin, it can be assessed from both LP and ME and the Bush conducts guided tours when there is enough snow. Info is on their website. If your up at the Bush I would highly reccomend it.

People also skin up from the trailhead on German Flats Rd to access the goods up as well.

If you talking about the Attitash thing....never mind...

__________
facebook.com/profile.php?id=1454198707#!/pages/American-Photoart-Gallery/90884206988
crystalmountainskier
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Apr 29, 2006

Posts: 195

Location:


Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 6:19 PM GMT

Keep in mind the new six pack and quad at The Canyons and high speed quad at Steamboat.
jaytrem
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Mar 21, 2002

Posts: 1168

Location:



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 6:23 PM GMT

I always thought a midstation on the Slidebrook Express would have been cool. No trails cut, just a convieniently placed midstation.
photogf128
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Apr 10, 2004

Posts: 2669

Location:
MRV Vermont



Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 6:37 PM GMT

That would be awesome! Believe it or not a few people have jumped off the chair, there is one section when your in jumpable height, if your crazy and there is alot of snow, to access the terrain. Pretty stupid tho as your pretty much at the bottom of the basin.

Unfortunately the Bush is resticted to how people are in the basin from the resort. One of the many regs they had to agree to in order to build the lift.

Being public land, a wildlife sensitive bear habitat, easy access, makes this a huge gray area, and has resulted in many a spirited debate around here.

__________
facebook.com/profile.php?id=1454198707#!/pages/American-Photoart-Gallery/90884206988
skiingfanatic68
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
May 09, 2004

Posts: 442

Location:
Greencastle, PA


Posted: Dec 07, 2006 - 9:17 PM GMT

I actually ask that exact question to the reps at Attitash booth during the Boston Ski show this year. They were exploring the idea back in 2003 with USFS, with the possibility of expanding behind the Summit Triple boundary on Attitash, but it fell to a grinding halt. The reps think is was because of the environmental impact the expansion would have caused on that area, though no EIS was ever conducted by Attitash and submitted to the USFS for review.

I definately know the plans do exist, Les Otten had them displayed back in 1992 or 93, just after the Kachina Chair opened on Bear Peak. The plans were to expand into the bowl area and create a trail & lift system that would wrap around that entire. It consisted of 3 or 4 lifts, with an increased vertical from the back peak on the ridgeline.
The unfortunate part was the display was taken down very quickly because year later, the display was gone when I returned there to ski.

I agree the terrain back there looks awesome, but alot of blasting and slope stabilization would be needed to preserve the natural water drainage in that area. It is sounds similar to the reason Mount Snow & Haystack were never connected. The restrictions limited expansion above 2500' in elevation to keep the Coldbrook stream at a class "A" water quality standard. I'm wondering if that might the case here too because of the natural drainage system runs down between Attitash & Bear Peak.
sledhaulingmedic
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Dec 20, 2002

Posts: 2882

Location:



Posted: Dec 08, 2006 - 11:07 AM GMT

Quote:
Most of the profits


Quote:
Hahahahahaha


Think: Small funnel


__________
"Don't piss off the locals, Don't make work for the patrol"
rocket21
Profile | Galleries

Rank:

Member Since:
Sep 13, 2001

Posts: 8888

Location:
USA



Posted: Dec 08, 2006 - 12:01 PM GMT

Think: a lemonade stand run by a kid on the side of the road will make more profit in one day than American Ski Company has made in the last 10 years.

__________
NewEnglandSkiHistory.com

Page: 1  2 

Wednesday July 30, 2014
Home : Privacy Policy : Terms of Use

Header image: Crotched Mountain (NH)

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owner.
© Copyright 2001-2006 by SnowJournal.com -- All Rights Reserved.

Network Services by Intercarve Networks
Powered by SnowFlake Content Management System - Version 1.0-beta5.2 (private)